Numerical Algorithms for the Calculation of Magneto-Quasistatic
Fields Using the Finite Integration Technique
The numerical simulation of transient
magneto-quasistatic fields ranges among the most challenging problems from
the point of modelling and numerical linear algebra in Computational Electromagnetics.
Using the Finite Integration Technique a magneto-quasistatic formulation
is considered, in which a curlcurl-formulation with a modified magnetic
vector potential results in a degenerated parabolic system of equations.
The degenerate character arises from the large nullspace of the curlcurl-stiffness
matrix and the typical singularity of the material matrix of conductivities.
The regularization of the formulation, the so-called "gauging", involves
techniques to control the irrotational parts of the vector potential in
the non-conductive regions. For the resulting systems of differential-algebraic
equations of Index 1 implicit time integration methods such as Gear's BDF-methods
or stiffly accurate SDIRK-methods are applicable. Stiff integrators with
embedded schemes, such as e.g. the L-stable, 3rd order Rosenbrock-Wanner-3(2)
method, which also provides an embedded scheme of 2nd order, allow to use
sophisticated error estimation schemes for variable time stepping.
Ferromagnetic material behavior in eddy current
simulations requires a nonlinear algebraic system to be solved at each
time step. Linearization methods such as the Successive-Step algorithm
with underrelaxation or a Newton-Raphson-scheme typically increase the
arithmetical work per time step significantly.
The SSOR-preconditioned Conjugate Gradient method
provides a robust solver for the repetitive solution of the consistently
singular linear systems, which is denoted as "weak gauging property". However,
since the asymptotical complexity of this method is not optimal, large
problems with millions of unknowns will require extensive calculation times.
Multigrid methods, which have to be especially
adapted to the singular curlcurl equations, show the required asymptotical
optimal complexity property and therefor is suited also for large numbers
of degrees of freedom.
Eddy current effects introduced by motion of conducting
materials are to be included, if e.g. linear motors or eddy current
brake systems are considered. Suitably augmented eddy current formulations
depend on the choice of the coordinate system for the moving conductor:
The Eulerian coordinate description, where the coordinate system is fixed
to the field excitation source, results in an additional advective term
in the system matrix. Here generalized CG-type methods for non-Hermitean
linear systems are to be applied. The stability of the scheme depends on
the motion velocities to be suitably slow.
In Lagrangian coordinate description, where the
coordinate system is fixed to the moving conductor, only the right hand
sides of the time discretized systems are modified and the system matrices
remain symmetric.
|